Country wise Applications implementation
Posted: 15 May 2019, 07:25
We want to understand the nuances of having "Application Name1 (Country)" against "Application Name1", "Country"
I understand the infra team recommends to have each "Application Name1 (Country)" because each will be tagged to different server.
I also know that we have deployed location tagged to application.
Please guide through these choices and its benefits.
Do note that if we avoid "Application Name1 (Country)" this option. Interfaces cannot show the connectivity differences. (Application Dependency Information View) Application to Application Interfaces. If the same application works / interact differently with another application hosted in different server because of change in country.
See the above it just shows a mapping application - list of servers but not showing exactly which application-site combination hosted in which server.
I understand the infra team recommends to have each "Application Name1 (Country)" because each will be tagged to different server.
I also know that we have deployed location tagged to application.
Please guide through these choices and its benefits.
Do note that if we avoid "Application Name1 (Country)" this option. Interfaces cannot show the connectivity differences. (Application Dependency Information View) Application to Application Interfaces. If the same application works / interact differently with another application hosted in different server because of change in country.
See the above it just shows a mapping application - list of servers but not showing exactly which application-site combination hosted in which server.