That's fine as the open world logic associated with owl may be too open for well definite entities such as those defined in an E.A.
But .. in some case it would be fine to have an rdf model of the ontology at hand *in the viewer*. Some use cases may be :
- +) linked/open data for public organizations,
PS: Note that this is already possible by exporting the essential ontology as rdf/rdfs and then scp the export to the file system on the tomcat server