Hi
I think there's an issue with the Application Diversity Analysis view (core_al_app_diversity_analysis.xsl). The data doesn't appear to populate the correct columns, see attached IT Governance Management screenshot.
In addition, when I only have application services mapped to application capabilities, without the associated implementing applications, it will correctly display the application capability and generate the correct number of rows for the mapped services but the services are not populated in the table. See attached Human Capital Management screenshot, which has 10 services mapped to the capability.
Regards
Ben
Formatting issue with Application Diversity Analysis view
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
Hi John
Unfortunately, the new view didn't work, no data is being displayed in the view. Let me know if you need anything further to help diagnose the issue.
Ben
Unfortunately, the new view didn't work, no data is being displayed in the view. Let me know if you need anything further to help diagnose the issue.
Ben
Sorry about this. Can you check if the application mart API is switched on. Look under Data_Set_API and see if Core API: Application Mart is there (and switched on)
if it is, then it may be that the file has been updated since the last OS release. In which case can you upload the attached api and republish.
Can you check if there are any errors in the console
if it is, then it may be that the file has been updated since the last OS release. In which case can you upload the attached api and republish.
Can you check if there are any errors in the console
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
That didn't work either. Core API: Application Mart is there and switched on, see screenshot. I uploaded the api and republished. I don't see any errors in the console.
Let me know if I can try anything else.
Let me know if I can try anything else.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
Interestingly with the online demo site, some capabilities are displayed correctly and some aren't...
displays correctly - https://essentialviewer.com/demo/report ... alysis.xsl
doesn't display correctly - https://essentialviewer.com/demo/report ... alysis.xsl
displays correctly - https://essentialviewer.com/demo/report ... alysis.xsl
doesn't display correctly - https://essentialviewer.com/demo/report ... alysis.xsl
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
Screenshot as requested.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
We can see there are multiple services tied to the cap. There is only one application linked to a service mapped. That is confusing us a little. Can you check if that one has a plan tied to it? Just click the active button in the roadmap enablement to switch it to inactive. Does anything change?
Attached is a different version which should show the services. Can you try this? Sorry, we can't fully replicate on our side yet, so a bit tricky
Attached is a different version which should show the services. Can you try this? Sorry, we can't fully replicate on our side yet, so a bit tricky
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
Ok we are making some progress 
Conclusion from my testing is that the services will only be visible and correctly formatted once an application has been mapped to ALL services. Here's the testing I did…
I'm not using any plans. Clicking the roadmap to switch to inactive didn't make a difference, the capabilities and services are not displayed.
The core_al_app_diversity_analysis2 view is correctly displaying the list of services however, the last 3 columns are not being displayed, see screenshot.
I may have also spotted something with the structure of my data that may have an impact on how the data being displayed. Only the 'Enterprise Architecture Management' service has an application mapped to it. To test this I mapped the other 6 services to the same application and republished. The original view now displays all the columns correctly, see second screenshot. core_al_app_diversity_analysis2 view still only lists capabilities and services as per the first screenshot.
As this page is used to display one application capability at a time could I suggest the following changes:
* Display services regardless of application mappings. I'm working on a greenfield project and the application will only be known once we have completed the RFP process which could take 12 months.
* Remove the application capability column and display the description below the view header. This column appears to be taking up unnecessary real-estate on the view.
* Add the service description below the service name, like the current capability column.
* Where the application capability is name is displayed at the top of the view, replace this with a drop-down to switch between different capabilities. Some other views have a similar feature.
It would be nice to see the formatting issue addressed (first bullet) if the other requests need to be added to a backlog.
Conclusion from my testing is that the services will only be visible and correctly formatted once an application has been mapped to ALL services. Here's the testing I did…
I'm not using any plans. Clicking the roadmap to switch to inactive didn't make a difference, the capabilities and services are not displayed.
The core_al_app_diversity_analysis2 view is correctly displaying the list of services however, the last 3 columns are not being displayed, see screenshot.
I may have also spotted something with the structure of my data that may have an impact on how the data being displayed. Only the 'Enterprise Architecture Management' service has an application mapped to it. To test this I mapped the other 6 services to the same application and republished. The original view now displays all the columns correctly, see second screenshot. core_al_app_diversity_analysis2 view still only lists capabilities and services as per the first screenshot.
As this page is used to display one application capability at a time could I suggest the following changes:
* Display services regardless of application mappings. I'm working on a greenfield project and the application will only be known once we have completed the RFP process which could take 12 months.
* Remove the application capability column and display the description below the view header. This column appears to be taking up unnecessary real-estate on the view.
* Add the service description below the service name, like the current capability column.
* Where the application capability is name is displayed at the top of the view, replace this with a drop-down to switch between different capabilities. Some other views have a similar feature.
It would be nice to see the formatting issue addressed (first bullet) if the other requests need to be added to a backlog.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ben.ralph.nmc
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 11:50
Brilliant, I'm looking forward to the new view.
If it helps with the design, I'm using the view with stakeholders as a discussion point to make sure we have captured all the application capabilities, services and functions they require for a greenfield hospital. We start by reviewing the value streams and business process hierarchy views to make sure they are relevant for the new hospital. This then drives the conversation for application capabilities, services and functions, which highlights any gaps in our current applications. The output is used as the input for the RFP technical requirements.
I think I've covered all my requests in my previous post and I'm not sure if this is the correct view to also include functions. It would be good to get your thoughts.
Thanks for taking the time to listen!
If it helps with the design, I'm using the view with stakeholders as a discussion point to make sure we have captured all the application capabilities, services and functions they require for a greenfield hospital. We start by reviewing the value streams and business process hierarchy views to make sure they are relevant for the new hospital. This then drives the conversation for application capabilities, services and functions, which highlights any gaps in our current applications. The output is used as the input for the RFP technical requirements.
I think I've covered all my requests in my previous post and I'm not sure if this is the correct view to also include functions. It would be good to get your thoughts.
Thanks for taking the time to listen!
First cut, we've not brought in the value streams yet, very, very draft for now but should let you progress, any bugs then let us know.
Taken on board most of your suggestions, we've used a slide in/out cap model rather than a select drop down - click an application or service count to get the capability breakdown. In the capability breakdown, if you click a tech product role, it will highlight where else the technology component is used in the capability.
Any thoughts/ideas welcome.
Taken on board most of your suggestions, we've used a slide in/out cap model rather than a select drop down - click an application or service count to get the capability breakdown. In the capability breakdown, if you click a tech product role, it will highlight where else the technology component is used in the capability.
Any thoughts/ideas welcome.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
