App. provider summary : bad links to database dependencies

Post Reply
jmk
Posts: 137
Joined: 31 May 2012, 12:08
Location: France

It is not possible to browse from application provider summary to the database dependencies.

There is a missing link in "linkClasses" for 'Information_Representation'

The following diff should correct that :

Code: Select all

diff --git a/application/core_al_app_provider_summary.xsl b/application/core_al_app_provider_summary.xsl
index dd53801..13c9eb0 100644
--- a/application/core_al_app_provider_summary.xsl
+++ b/application/core_al_app_provider_summary.xsl
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 
        <!-- START GENERIC LINK VARIABLES -->
        <xsl:variable name="viewScopeTerms" select="eas:get_scoping_terms_from_string($viewScopeTermIds)"/>
-       <xsl:variable name="linkClasses" select="('Application_Service', 'Application_Provider', 'Business_Process', 'Application_Strategic_Plan', 'Site', 'Group_Actor', 'Technology_Component', 'Technology_Product', 'Infrastructure_Software_Instance', 'Hardware_Instance', 'Application_Software_Instance', 'Information_Store_Instance', 'Technology_Node', 'Individual_Actor', 'Application_Function', 'Application_Function_Implementation', 'Enterprise_Strategic_Plan')"/>
+       <xsl:variable name="linkClasses" select="('Application_Service', 'Application_Provider', 'Business_Process', 'Application_Strategic_Plan', 'Site', 'Group_Actor', 'Technology_Component', 'Technology_Product', 'Infrastructure_Software_Instance', 'Hardware_Instance', 'Application_Software_Instance', 'Information_Store_Instance', 'Information_Representation', 'Technology_Node', 'Individual_Actor', 'Application_Function', 'Application_Function_Implementation', 'Enterprise_Strategic_Plan')"/>
        <!-- END GENERIC LINK VARIABLES -->
 
        <!-- START VIEW SPECIFIC SETUP VARIABES -->

User avatar
neil.walsh
Posts: 444
Joined: 16 Feb 2009, 13:45
Contact:

Thanks, we've just captured and patched that straight away.
We'll roll that out into our next minor release.
Thanks for your contribution
Neil
Post Reply